getch your bonfire on

in answer to the poll (which i am shocked, by the way, that no one has commented on) i vote reciprocalities; this pretty much based on that for me they end the same, at least mine often, with what seems like kindof a whiz-banger, even if this is often in the form of the not happened whiz banger, "it's over?!?!?" which i guess at least isn't something that happens in novels and certainly not in movies these days or songs of the pop.

2. am i distraught by the blog usage for what had seemed to me a pretty focused farm use - discovering farm in its many forms anyways and then you've gone and written about the poker night and even mentioned the restaurant (and hell, without mentioning the food that much)? no, not terribly. yes. I liked it being about the farm, altho im not sure gary had caught on that that was my initial motive anyways. Um, i also am enjoying the talking to you: so given that im not sure i understand this part of "where is will wheaton,": "i have figured out the strategy, but am too bored with it to apply it - knowing that polarities consist necessarily in everything, would avoiding the application be disingenuous and, as i accused bryan of, erecting before myself an impasse - inextricable from this is the aspect of competition, from which i completely, comprehensively, more or less deliberately, dropped out of many years ago" is this the strategy of poker, life, or something else, or the kind of life that poker games are like. I've enjoyed the gameplaying this past week here in the mid-west (is everyone clear that rachel and I are staying at here mom's house in st louis after having worked our last season at quail hill farm in amagansett new york and furthermore, before the next reel, that we will be moving to burlington, etc, see below: that's probably an etiquette that has been figured out for blogging, what to presume you know, im sure you don't look like an avatar.

anyways i think its clear that pink clouds has no limits, that's why you're invited, this you being rachel, i wouldn't invite anyone that i wanted to put limits on, so you can interpret that as pretty snobby pretty easily. but.

notes on above: gary is our one commentor thus far, i think i left out the part about why/how the games allow me at least to get my game on here, and how the midwest is different, and actually looked really nice today in the sun, as brown as . . . but ill be happy for a bit of cold.

is this the place for a full on discussion of game-ungame, i guess Rachel, my thing with the blog is i try to make it fun for me and the audience, thats right, something im saying about the blog is audience audience audience, - and i sure as shit aint saying you should treat it the same, just that that seems to be how i go about it, thus far, be it meandering as all get out, need not return it doesn't, but THEY are out there or something for me for now. love